Skip to content

← DirectoryCompare →

Galileo

galileo.ai

Poor
Top 86%of 296 ai vendor vendors measured
ai vendor⚠ Unverified — automated scan only, no vendor confirmationScanned 9/6/2026Added 9/3/2026

Score breakdown

Incident historypending

Signals planned: breach-history lookup, incident response quality assessment. This category is coming soon.

Governance+0/31 bonus pts

SOC 2 Type I

Not found0

ISO 42001

Not found0

Board-level oversight

Requires vendor submission — not yet collected.

HIPAA

Not found0

SOC 2 Type II

Not found0

ISO 27001

Not found0
Verification bonus+0/5 bonus pts

Claimed profile

Domain ownership verified by claiming the profile0/5
AI safetypending

Signals planned: model card presence, training data disclosure, published red-team results. Some checks will be partially automated via website scanning; others require vendor submission.

Security hygiene & transparency7/28 pts

HTTPS + HSTS

HTTP redirects to HTTPS+3
HSTS header enforced+2

Source: response headers from galileo.ai · Scanned 9/6/2026

Trust page

Public trust/security page found0/5

security.txt

security.txt file foundFail
Contact field present0/2
Expires field present0/2
Encryption field present0/1

Disclosure policy

Security disclosure page found0/3
Page references vulnerability reporting0/2

Security headers

Content-Security-Policy header0/3
X-Frame-Options header0/2
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff+2
Referrer-Policy header0/1

Source: response headers from galileo.ai · Scanned 9/6/2026

Rubric v1.3.0 · 7/28 implemented pts · click a category to see details

Current:Poor
With verification:Fair(+5pts)
Claim this profile to improve your grade →

Score history (4 updates)

↑ improving
F · 7/38pts · v1F · 7/38pts · v2D- · 7/28pts · v3D- · 7/28pts · v4
v1F → F → D- → D-v4

Score history

v3

Grade improved: F → D-

9/6/2026

Scanned 3d ago

AI models used

Self-disclosed · unconfirmedGPT-3.5 (OpenAI)Gemini (Google)Claude (Anthropic)GPT-4 (OpenAI)Llama (Meta)DeepSeekOpenAI o-series (o1/o3/o4)GPT-4o (OpenAI)

Found in galileo.ai’s llms.txt, captured by Entropy on 9/6/2026. Not vendor-confirmed — the vendor can confirm or correct this from their dashboard.

Show what we found
  • GPT-3.5 (OpenAI) — “- [Galileo Luna EFM Breakthrough](https://galileo.ai/blog/galileo-luna-breakthrough-in-llm-evaluation-beating-gpt-3-5-and-ragas): How Luna beats GPT-3.5 and RAGAS in cost and evaluation efficiency” (llms.txt)
  • Gemini (Google) — “- [Gemini 2.5 Pro Overview](https://galileo.ai/model-hub/gemini-2-5-pro-overview): Gemini 2.5 Pro's conversation handling, capabilities, and cost efficiency analysis” (llms.txt)
  • Claude (Anthropic) — “- [Claude Sonnet 4 Overview](https://galileo.ai/model-hub/claude-sonnet-4-overview): Claude Sonnet 4's capabilities and impact on AI development economics” (llms.txt)
  • GPT-4 (OpenAI) — “- [GPT-4.1 Mini Overview](https://galileo.ai/model-hub/gpt-4-1-mini-overview): Speed, cost, and performance analysis of GPT-4.1 Mini” (llms.txt)
  • Llama (Meta) — “- [Llama 3.3 70B Overview](https://galileo.ai/model-hub/llama-3.3-70b-overview): Performance benchmarks, costs, and deployment tips for Llama 3.3 70B” (llms.txt)
  • DeepSeek — “- [DeepSeek-V3 Overview](https://galileo.ai/model-hub/deepseek-v3-overview): DeepSeek-V3's efficiency and performance in complex task environments” (llms.txt)
  • OpenAI o-series (o1/o3/o4) — “- [DeepSeek R1 vs. OpenAI O1](https://galileo.ai/blog/deepseek-r1-vs-openai-o1-comparison): Comprehensive comparison of DeepSeek R1 and OpenAI O1 on key dimensions” (llms.txt)
  • GPT-4o (OpenAI) — “- [GPT-4 vs. GPT-4o vs. GPT-4 Turbo](https://galileo.ai/blog/gpt-4-vs-gpt-4o-vs-gpt-4-turbo): Key differences among GPT-4 model variants for deployment decisions” (llms.txt)

View the full llms.txt snapshot Entropy captured →