Witness
Score breakdown
AI safetypending
Signals planned: model card presence, training data disclosure, published red-team results. Some checks will be partially automated via website scanning; others require vendor submission.
Verification bonus+0/5 bonus pts
Claimed profile
Security hygiene & transparency8/28 pts
Disclosure policy
Trust page
Source: response headers from witness.ai · Scanned 9/6/2026
Security headers
Source: response headers from witness.ai · Scanned 9/6/2026
Governance+0/31 bonus pts
Board-level oversight
Requires vendor submission — not yet collected.
Incident historypending
Signals planned: breach-history lookup, incident response quality assessment. This category is coming soon.
Rubric v1.3.0 · 8/28 implemented pts · click a category to see details
Score history (5 updates)
↑ improvingScore history
Grade improved: F → D-
Score +5pts (3 → 8)
trustPagePresence.found added (+pts)
Recomputed from already-known data, not a full rescan
9/6/2026
AI models used
Found in witness.ai’s llms.txt, captured by Entropy on 9/6/2026. Not vendor-confirmed — the vendor can confirm or correct this from their dashboard.
Show what we found
- DeepSeek — “* DeepSeek Security Risks (https://witness.ai/blog-winning-the-game-of-hide-and-deepseek/): Security implications of Chinese-hosted AI models and data sovereignty concerns” (llms.txt)
Community Reviews
Not part of the Entropy score.
Loading…
Loading reviews…